Report
What work well : The temperature were on my side, with nice clouds. The fact that I was sure how to light the place, I was confortable with the shoot. Most of the teams were shooting in the morning so the place were almost empty, so it was easier to deal. We had all equipment we needed and the model was there at the right time.
What did not work: I was there at 12:00, but because Mathieu were very late with the flashes, I started to shoot at 2 pm. I had to do it really quick because I was affraid that the light change and because we had to leave at 4hr30.
I changed the light in the back and instead of place it at the left, I placed it at the right and I did multiple exposures with 2 differents set up so it could be easier to correct the little things in post process. So it gives better results in the background instead of having a bright spot. (thanks Val for the comments at the shoot) I used the same settings that I described in the pre-light report, but I used a 50 mm lens because I prefer the quality of this lens (sharp and brighter).
Post process : I corrected the thungsteen lights and the white balance. I did 2 masks with some different exposures. The light problem I got is that even my screen at home is calibrate, I don't have the same result at school with the Mac...... I hope the result is not going to be that desaturate as the result I have on my labtop.
I totally forgot to submit the picture tonight in the dropbox at school because of the shooting in applied studio.......... I have no choice to put it tomorow....


No comments:
Post a Comment